16
March
2026

AG Brown sues OneMain Financial for alleged bait-and-switch lending scheme

What the Washington AG’s OneMain Lawsuit Means for Independent Dealers

In many independent dealerships, the person handling the finance paperwork might also be the person who appraised the trade, worked the deal with the customer, answered the phone earlier that morning, and will probably be on the lot again before the day is over.

Independent dealers are used to wearing multiple hats. In smaller stores, that reality is simply part of the business. Even in larger operations, the same people are often responsible for several critical pieces of the transaction, from structuring the deal to contracting the paperwork to explaining the products that may be included in the financing.

That flexibility is one of the strengths of the independent dealer model. It allows stores to operate efficiently and serve customers quickly. But it also means that some of the most complex parts of the business, particularly finance and contracting, can easily become areas of risk if there isn’t a clear and consistent process behind them.

This is not a challenge limited to small operations. Stores of every size face it. Whether a dealer is running a two-person lot or managing a larger team with a dedicated finance office, the same truth applies. The paperwork matters, the disclosures matter, and the way those conversations happen with customers matters.

That reality is part of why stories involving finance practices tend to resonate so strongly across the automotive industry. Earlier this month, Washington Attorney General Nick Brown joined a coalition of attorneys general from across the country in filing a lawsuit against installment lender OneMain Financial, alleging that the company engaged in deceptive lending practices by packing loans with add-on products and failing to clearly disclose their costs to consumers.

According to the complaint, some consumers seeking what they believed to be straightforward installment loans were rushed through loan closings where additional products were included in the financing without clear explanation, sometimes adding hundreds or even thousands of dollars to the total cost of the loan.

Stories like this move quickly through the financial services world, and they often raise understandable questions in industries that work closely with consumer financing. Independent dealers know better than most how quickly the public conversation around lending practices can expand, and how easily the actions of one company can cast a wider shadow.

But if there is a lesson in moments like this, it is not that aftermarket products are inherently the problem. Products such as service contracts, GAP coverage, and other protections have long played a legitimate role in helping customers manage risk. When presented properly, many of these products provide meaningful value to consumers who are trying to protect a major purchase.

The issue raised in the lawsuit is not the existence of add-on products. The issue is how they are presented.

At the center of the complaint are allegations about process. The lawsuit describes loan closings where customers were rushed through electronic documents, where the pace of the closing was controlled by the lender’s employees, and where the true cost of optional products was not clearly explained in a way the consumer could reasonably understand.

For those of us in the automotive industry, this lands squarely in familiar territory. The finance office has always been one of the most important places in any dealership. It is where numbers turn into agreements, where disclosures matter, and where trust between the customer and the dealership is either strengthened or weakened.

That trust is built through process.

Strong dealerships do not rely on improvisation when it comes to finance. They build a process that is consistent, transparent, and repeatable. Customers are given time to review documents, the terms of every product are explained clearly, and the conversation moves at a pace that allows the customer to understand what they are signing. When that process is followed every time, it does more than create efficiency. It creates fairness. Every customer receives the same information, the same opportunity to ask questions, and the same clear presentation of options.

Training plays an equally important role. Finance managers carry a tremendous amount of responsibility, and the best stores treat the position accordingly. A strong F&I professional understands not only how to structure a deal, but how to explain it. They know the aftermarket products they offer, the forms they present, and the regulatory requirements behind the disclosures. Just as importantly, they understand how to communicate those things in plain language so a customer can make an informed decision.

One of the more notable elements of the complaint is the suggestion that consumers sometimes did not fully understand that the cost of add-on products was being financed into their loan, increasing both the principal and the interest over time.

That detail highlights something every dealer already knows: selling a product is easy. Explaining it properly takes skill.

Customers should leave the finance office understanding what they purchased, what it costs, and why it might benefit them. When those conversations happen clearly and without pressure, the relationship between the dealership and the customer becomes stronger rather than transactional. As we all know this is where referrals and continued business begin. 

At the association, we also recognize that this part of the business can be one of the most challenging for independent dealers. Many of our members are handling multiple responsibilities throughout the day, and the finance and contracting side of the business can quickly become an area where small oversights create larger exposure.

That is one of the reasons we are currently developing a new F&I training program focused specifically on best practices for independent dealers. The goal is not simply to teach product presentations, but to help dealers build consistent, defensible processes around disclosures, contracting, and documentation.

We will also be addressing many of these topics at WIDCON this year. One of the sessions will focus on some of the most common risk areas we see in the finance office, including contracting practices, documentation, and the forms dealers rely on every day. These are often the places where small misunderstandings or inconsistent processes can create problems for a business.

Our goal is simple. We want dealers to leave with a clearer understanding of where the pressure points are and how to build processes that protect both the customer and the dealership.

Independent dealers have always succeeded by building relationships in their communities. That reputation is earned one customer at a time, often in the quiet moments when someone is sitting across the desk trying to understand the details of a purchase that matters to them.

When we take the time to explain those details clearly, to present products honestly, and to follow a process that treats every customer fairly, we reinforce something that has always been true about this industry.

Trust is still the most valuable thing we sell.

Categories: Dealer Alerts, News